J. Allik and T. Tuulmets, Occupancy model of perceived numerosity, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.190, issue.4, pp.303-314, 1991.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03205986

J. Allik, T. Tuulmets, and P. G. Vos, Size invariance in visual number discrimination, Psychological Research, vol.25, issue.4, pp.290-295, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00920482

R. Arrighi, I. Togoli, and D. C. Burr, A generalized sense of number, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol.108, issue.3, pp.281-282, 1797.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.006

J. Bell, E. Dickinson, D. R. Badcock, and F. A. Kingdom, Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues, Journal of Visualized Experiments, issue.82, p.50877, 2013.
DOI : 10.3791/50877

J. Bell, J. E. Dickinson, and D. R. Badcock, Radial frequency adaptation suggests polar-based coding of local shape cues, Vision Research, vol.48, issue.21, pp.48-2293, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.003

J. Bell, J. Kanji, and F. A. Kingdom, Discrimination of rotated-in-depth curves is facilitated by stereoscopic cues, but curvature is not tuned for stereoscopic rotation-in-depth, Vision Research, vol.77, pp.14-20, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.visres.2012.11.003

D. J. Bennett and Q. C. Vuong, A stereo advantage in generalizing over changes in viewpoint on object recognition tasks, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.61, issue.7, pp.1082-1093, 2006.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03193711

D. H. Brainard, The Psychophysics Toolbox, Spatial Vision, vol.10, issue.4, pp.433-436, 1997.
DOI : 10.1163/156856897X00357

H. H. Bulthoff, S. Y. Edelman, and M. J. Tarr, How Are Three-Dimensional Objects Represented in the Brain?, Cerebral Cortex, vol.5, issue.3, pp.247-260, 1995.
DOI : 10.1093/cercor/5.3.247

D. Burke, Combining disparate views of objects: Viewpoint costs are reduced by stereopsis, Visual Cognition, vol.12, issue.5, pp.705-719, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00013-4

D. Burke, J. Taubert, and T. Higman, Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalising across different views of faces, Vision Research, vol.47, issue.16, pp.47-2164, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.018

D. Burr and J. Ross, Response: Visual number, Current Biology, vol.18, issue.18, pp.857-858, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.052

URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.052

D. Burr and J. Ross, A Visual Sense of Number, Current Biology, vol.18, issue.6, pp.425-428, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.052

S. C. Dakin, M. S. Tibber, J. A. Greenwood, F. A. Kingdom, and M. J. Morgan, A common visual metric for approximate number and density, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pp.108-19552, 2011.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.1113195108

URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241748

F. H. Durgin, Texture contrast aftereffects are monocular; texture density aftereffects are binocular, Vision Research, vol.41, issue.20, pp.2619-2630, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00121-3

URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00121-3

F. H. Durgin, Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited, Current Biology, vol.18, issue.18, pp.855-856, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.053

F. H. Durgin and A. C. Huk, Texture density aftereffects in the perception of artificial and natural textures, Vision Research, vol.37, issue.23, pp.3273-3282, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00126-0

F. H. Durgin and D. R. Proffitt, Visual learning in the perception of texture: simple and contingent aftereffects of texture density, Spatial Vision, vol.9, issue.4, pp.423-474, 1996.
DOI : 10.1163/156856896X00204

M. Fendick and G. Westheimer, Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity, Vision Research, vol.23, issue.2, pp.145-150, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90137-2

E. Gheorghiu, F. A. Kingdom, M. T. Thai, and L. Sampasivam, Binocular properties of curvature-encoding mechanisms revealed through two shape after-effects, Vision Research, vol.49, issue.14, pp.49-1765, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.010

J. A. Greenwood and M. Edwards, Pushing the limits of transparent-motion detection with binocular disparity, Vision Research, vol.46, issue.16, pp.2615-2624, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.022

L. He, J. Zhang, T. Zhou, and L. Chen, Connectedness affects dot numerosity judgment: Implications for configural processing, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.63, issue.3, pp.509-517, 2009.
DOI : 10.3758/PBR.16.3.509

I. P. Howard and B. J. Rogers, Binocular vision and stereopsis, 1995.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195084764.001.0001

E. L. Kaufman and M. W. Lord, The Discrimination of Visual Number, The American Journal of Psychology, vol.62, issue.4, pp.498-525, 1949.
DOI : 10.2307/1418556

L. Lee, Y. Saunders, and J. A. , Stereo improves 3D shape discrimination even when rich monocular shape cues are available, Journal of Vision, vol.116, issue.9, pp.1-12, 2011.

S. P. Mckee and D. G. Taylor, The precision of binocular and monocular depth judgments in natural settings, Journal of Vision, vol.10, issue.10, pp.1-13, 2010.
DOI : 10.1167/10.10.5

A. I. Meso, S. Durant, and J. M. Zanker, Perceptual separation of transparent motion components: the interaction of motion, luminance and shape cues, Experimental Brain Research, vol.28, issue.1, pp.71-86, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s00221-013-3631-0

I. Mills, T. Cvitas, K. Hosman, N. Kallay, and K. Kuchitsu, Green book: IUPAC quantities , units and symbols in physical chemistry, 1993.

M. J. Morgan, S. Raphael, M. S. Tibber, and S. C. Dakin, A texture-processing model of the 'visual sense of number', Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol.1, issue.4, pp.281-282, 1790.
DOI : 10.1163/156856897X00366

M. Piazza, A. Mechelli, B. Butterworth, and C. J. Price, Are Subitizing and Counting Implemented as Separate or Functionally Overlapping Processes?, NeuroImage, vol.15, issue.2, pp.435-446, 2002.
DOI : 10.1006/nimg.2001.0980

M. Piazza, P. Pinel, L. Bihan, D. Dehaene, and S. , A Magnitude Code Common to Numerosities and Number Symbols in Human Intraparietal Cortex, Neuron, vol.53, issue.2, pp.293-305, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.022

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00349655

N. Qian, R. A. Andersen, and E. H. Adelson, Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. III. Modeling, Journal of Neuroscience, issue.12, pp.14-7381, 1994.

S. Raphael, B. Dillenburger, and M. Morgan, Computation of relative numerosity of circular dot textures, Journal of Vision, vol.13, issue.2, pp.1-11, 2013.
DOI : 10.1167/13.2.17

D. Regan, Human perception of objects, 2000.

J. Ross, Visual Discrimination of Number without Counting, Perception, vol.19, issue.7, pp.867-870, 2003.
DOI : 10.1068/p5029

J. Ross and D. C. Burr, Vision senses number directly, Journal of Vision, vol.10, issue.2, pp.1-18, 2010.
DOI : 10.1167/10.2.10

H. Sawamura, K. Shima, and J. Tanji, Numerical representation for action in the parietal cortex of the monkey, Nature, vol.415, issue.6874, pp.415-918, 2002.
DOI : 10.1038/415918a

P. Scarfe and P. B. Hibbard, Disparity-defined objects moving in depth do not elicit three-dimensional shape constancy, Vision Research, vol.46, issue.10, pp.1599-1610, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.visres.2005.11.002

A. C. Schütz, There's more behind it: Perceived depth order biases perceived numerosity/density, Journal of Vision, vol.12, issue.12, pp.1-16, 2012.
DOI : 10.1167/12.12.9

T. J. Simon and S. Vaishnavi, Subitizing and counting depend on different attentional mechanisms: Evidence from visual enumeration in afterimages, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.48, issue.6, pp.915-926, 1996.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03205493

R. J. Snowden and M. C. Rossiter, Stereoscopic Depth Cues Can Segment Motion Information, Perception, vol.33, issue.2, pp.193-201, 1999.
DOI : 10.1068/p2735

M. S. Tibber, J. A. Greenwood, and S. C. Dakin, Number and density discrimination rely on a common metric: Similar psychophysical effects of size, contrast, and divided attention, Journal of Vision, vol.12, issue.6, pp.1-19, 2012.
DOI : 10.1167/12.6.8

M. Tokita and A. Ishiguchi, How might the discrepancy in the effects of perceptual variables on numerosity judgment be reconciled?, Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.72, issue.7, pp.1839-1853, 2010.
DOI : 10.3758/APP.72.7.1839

M. Valsecchi, M. Toscani, and K. R. Gegenfurtner, Perceived numerosity is reduced in peripheral vision, Journal of Vision, vol.13, issue.13, pp.1-16, 2013.
DOI : 10.1167/13.13.7

S. N. Watamaniuk, Visible Persistence is Reduced by Fixed-Trajectory Motion but Not by Random Motion, Perception, vol.12, issue.6, pp.791-802, 1992.
DOI : 10.1068/p210791

A. E. Welchman, A. Deubelius, V. Conrad, H. H. Bulthoff, and Z. Kourtzi, 3D shape perception from combined depth cues in human visual cortex, Nature Neuroscience, vol.19, issue.6, pp.820-827, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.006

G. Westheimer and M. W. Pettet, Contrast and Duration of Exposure Differentially Affect Vernier and Stereoscopic Acuity, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol.241, issue.1300, pp.241-283, 1300.
DOI : 10.1098/rspb.1990.0063

C. Wheatstone, Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. Part the First. On Some Remarkable, and Hitherto Unobserved, Phenomena of Binocular Vision, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, vol.128, issue.0, pp.371-394, 1838.
DOI : 10.1098/rstl.1838.0019