Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Book sections

Conflicts in Decision Making

Abstract : Following Nick Baigent’s argument that one must go “behind the veil of preference” (Baigent, Jpn Econ Rev 46(1):88–101, 1995) to be able to develop a satisfactory theory of rational behaviour, we propose to analyse potential intrapersonal conflicts caused by different reasons, goals or motivations to choose one option over another, which may make the development of a coherent preference impossible. We do this by presenting an extensive, but certainly not exhaustive overview of psychological research on intrapersonal conflict, its influence on preference reversal (and hence on incoherent behaviour), on psychological well-being and on motivational and behavioural changes over time. We then briefly describe our own theory of choice under conflicting motivations (Arlegi and Teschl, Working Papers of the Department of Economics DT 1208, Public University of Navarre, 2012), which is a first attempt at putting psychological insights into intrapersonal conflict into an axiomatic economic context.
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01456103
Contributor : Patrice Cacciuttolo <>
Submitted on : Friday, February 3, 2017 - 11:58:13 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, August 5, 2020 - 3:16:41 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01456103, version 1

Collections

Citation

Ritxar Arlegi, Miriam Teschl. Conflicts in Decision Making. Binder, Constanze and Codognato, Giulio and Teschl, Miriam and Xu, Yongsheng. Individual and Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp.11--29, 2015, 978-3-662-46438-0 / 978-3-662-46439-7. ⟨hal-01456103⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

143