HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

To Count or Not to Count Deaths: Reranking Effects in Health Distribution Evaluation

Abstract : Populations' structures and sizes can be a result of healthcare policy decisions. We use a two‐period theoretical framework and a dynamic microsimulation model to examine the consequences of this assertion on the appraisal of alternative health policy options. Results show that standard welfare‐in‐health measures are sensitive to changes in populations' sizes, in that taking into account the (virtual) existence of the dead can alter the ranking of policy options. Disregarding differences in the survivals induced by alternative policies can bias programmes' ranking in favour of less live‐saving policies. The paper alerts on the risk of policy misranking by the use of ex‐post cross‐sectional analyses, neglecting deaths occurring in the past as well as counterfactual deaths in alternative policy scenarios. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01457395
Contributor : Elisabeth Lhuillier Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, February 6, 2017 - 2:18:27 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, February 8, 2022 - 10:53:45 AM

Links full text

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Yves Arrighi, Mohammad Abu-Zaineh, Bruno Ventelou. To Count or Not to Count Deaths: Reranking Effects in Health Distribution Evaluation. Health Economics, Wiley, 2015, 24 (2), pp.193--205. ⟨10.1002/hec.3010⟩. ⟨hal-01457395⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

42