S. Stockholm, 10 Department of Otolaryngology, Laryngological Oncology, pp.90-549

A. Davis and A. Refaie, Chapter 1, Tinnitus Handbook, pp.1-24, 2000.
DOI : 10.1300/J005v31n01_01

B. Langguth, P. Kreuzer, T. Kleinjung, D. Ridder, and D. , Tinnitus: causes and clinical management, The Lancet Neurology, vol.12, issue.9, pp.920-3010, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70160-1

R. Schaette, Tinnitus in men, mice (as well as other rodents), and machines, Hearing Research, vol.311, pp.63-71, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.heares.2013.12.004

M. Landgrebe, F. Zeman, M. Koller, Y. Eberl, M. Mohr et al., The Tinnitus Research Initiative (TRI) database: A new approach for delineation of tinnitus subtypes and generation of predictors for treatment outcome, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol.43, issue.1, p.2920857, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.05.029

R. Tyler and L. Baker, Difficulties Experienced by Tinnitus Sufferers, Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, vol.48, issue.2, pp.150-154, 1983.
DOI : 10.1044/jshd.4802.150

D. Hoare, V. Kowalkowski, S. Kang, and D. Hall, Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials examining tinnitus management, The Laryngoscope, vol.25, issue.suppl 9, pp.1555-64, 2011.
DOI : 10.1002/lary.21825

P. Martinez-devesa, R. Perera, M. Theodoulou, and A. Waddell, Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.1, 2010.
DOI : 10.1002/14651858.cd005233.pub3

R. Cima, I. Maes, M. Joore, D. Scheyen, E. Refaie et al., Specialised treatment based on cognitive behaviour therapy versus usual care for tinnitus: a randomised controlled trial, The Lancet, vol.379, issue.9830, pp.1951-1960, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60469-3

B. Langguth, Tinnitus: the end of therapeutic nihilism, The Lancet, vol.379, issue.9830, pp.1926-1934, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60561-3

D. Hall, H. Haider, D. Kikidis, M. Mielczarek, B. Mazurek et al., Toward a global consensus on outcome measures for clinical trials in tinnitus: report from the First International Meeting of the COMiT Initiative The Netherlands. Trends in Hearing, p.4409939, 2014.

C. Plein, J. Harounian, E. Floyd, R. Irizarry, G. Ferzli et al., A Systematic Review of Eligibility and Outcomes in Tinnitus Trials, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, vol.26, issue.2, pp.24-32, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4

D. Tunkel, C. Bauer, G. Sun, R. Rosenfeld, S. Chandrasekhar et al., Clinical Practice Guideline, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, vol.31, issue.10, pp.1-40, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66048-8

D. Hall, M. Láinez, C. Newman, T. Sanchez, M. Egler et al., Treatment options for subjective tinnitus: Self reports from a sample of general practitioners and ENT physicians within Europe and the USA, BMC Health Services Research, vol.121, issue.7, p.3227628, 2011.
DOI : 10.1002/lary.21825

P. Williamson, D. Altman, J. Blazeby, M. Clarke, D. Devane et al., Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider, Trials, vol.34, issue.1, pp.1-8, 2012.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393
URL : http://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-132

B. Langguth, R. Goodey, A. Azevedo, A. Bjorne, A. Cacace et al., Consensus for tinnitus patient assessment and treatment outcome measurement: Tinnitus Research Initiative meeting, Regensburg, July 2006, Prog Brain Res, vol.166, issue.07, pp.525-561, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66050-6
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4283806

D. Hall, A. Szczepek, V. Kennedy, and H. Haider, Current-reported outcome domains in studies of adults with a focus on the treatment of tinnitus: protocol for a systematic review, BMJ Open, vol.33, issue.(Suppl 12), p.4654381, 2015.
DOI : 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009091

A. Liberati, D. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. Gøtzsche et al., The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, vol.151, issue.4, p.2714672, 2009.

I. Needleman, S. Chin, O. Brien, T. Petrie, A. Donos et al., Systematic review of outcome measurements and reference group(s) to evaluate and compare implant success and failure, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol.35, issue.Suppl. 8, pp.122-154, 2012.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01836.x

J. Hutton and P. Williamson, Bias in meta-analysis due to outcome variable selection within studies, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), vol.49, issue.3, pp.359-70, 2000.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-9876.00197

K. Dwan, C. Gamble, R. Kolamunnage-dona, S. Mohammed, C. Powell et al., Assessing the potential for outcome reporting bias in a review: a tutorial, Trials, vol.129, issue.6, pp.52-62, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-3476(96)70023-9

R. Smyth, J. Kirkham, A. Jacoby, D. Altman, C. Gamble et al., Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists, BMJ, vol.342, issue.jan06 1, p.3016816, 2011.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.c7153

C. Newman, G. Jacobson, and J. Spitzer, Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol.122, issue.2, pp.143-151, 1996.
DOI : 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007

G. Goebel and W. Hiller, The tinnitus questionnaire. A standard instrument for grading the degree of tinnitus. Results of a multicenter study with the tinnitus questionnaire, HNO, vol.42, issue.3, pp.166-72, 1994.

R. Hallam, S. Jakes, and R. Hinchcliffe, Cognitive variables in tinnitus annoyance, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol.27, issue.3, pp.213-235, 1988.
DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00778.x

I. Pulte, Efficacy, safety and tolerability of neramexane in comparison to placebo in patients with subjective tinnitus. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00772980, 2008.

K. Fackrell, D. Hall, J. Barry, and D. Hoare, Tools for tinnitus measurement: development and validity of questionnaires to assess handicap and treatment effects Tinnitus: causes, treatment and short and long-term health effects, pp.13-60, 2014.

C. Newman, S. Sandridge, and G. Jacobson, Psychometric adequacy of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) for evaluating treatment outcome, J Am Acad Audiol, vol.9, issue.2, pp.153-60, 1998.

S. Robinson, E. Viirre, K. Bailey, S. Kindermann, A. Minassian et al., A randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavior therapy for tinnitus, Int Tinnitus J, vol.14, issue.2, pp.119-145, 2008.

B. Mazurek, H. Haupt, A. Szczepek, J. Sandmann, J. Gross et al., Evaluation of vardenafil for the treatment of subjective tinnitus: a controlled pilot study, Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, vol.121, issue.Pt 3, pp.3-10, 2009.
DOI : 10.1017/S0022215106005512

H. Olze, A. Szczepek, H. Haupt, N. Zirke, S. Graebel et al., The Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus, Stress and Quality of Life in Postlingually Deafened Patients, Audiology and Neurotology, vol.17, issue.1, pp.2-11, 2011.
DOI : 10.1159/000323847

Y. Nakamaru, Open-label crossover study for the efficacy of escitalopram and mecobalamin for patients with tinnitus, UMIN Clinical Trials Registry

D. Hoare, M. Edmondson-jones, M. Sereda, M. Akeroyd, and D. Hall, Amplification with hearing aids for patients with tinnitus and co-existing hearing loss, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol.2014
DOI : 10.1002/14651858.cd010151

J. Hobson, E. Chisholm, E. Refaie, and A. , Sound therapy (masking) in the management of tinnitus in adults, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, issue.11, 2012.

J. Epstein, R. Santo, and F. Guillemin, A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.68, issue.4, pp.435-476, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021

F. Kuk, R. Tyler, D. Russell, and H. Jordan, The Psychometric Properties of a Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire, Ear and Hearing, vol.11, issue.6, pp.434-479, 1990.
DOI : 10.1097/00003446-199012000-00005

J. Ioannidis, S. Evans, P. Gøtzsche, O. Neill, R. Altman et al., Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.141, issue.10, pp.781-789, 2004.
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00009

S. Granberg, J. Dahlström, C. Möller, K. Kähäri, D. The et al., The ICF Core Sets for hearing loss ??? researcher perspective. Part I: Systematic review of outcome measures identified in audiological research, International Journal of Audiology, vol.7, issue.1, pp.65-76, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s10067-005-0156-3

F. Barker, E. Mackenzie, L. Elliott, and S. De-lusignan, Outcome Measurement in Adult Auditory Rehabilitation, Ear and Hearing, vol.36, issue.5, pp.567-73, 2015.
DOI : 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000167

E. Maund, B. Tendal, A. Hróbjartsson, K. Jørgensen, A. Lundh et al., Benefits and harms in clinical trials of duloxetine for treatment of major depressive disorder: comparison of clinical study reports, trial registries, and publications, BMJ, vol.348, issue.jun04 2, p.4045316, 2014.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.g3510

A. Morrison, J. Polisena, D. Husereau, K. Moulton, M. Clark et al., THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, vol.7, issue.02, pp.138-182, 2012.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020334

R. Macefield, M. Jacobs, I. Korfage, J. Nicklin, R. Whistance et al., Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs), Trials, vol.15, issue.1, p.3916696, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1
URL : http://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-49

D. Moher, S. Hopewell, K. Schulz, V. Montoni, P. Gøtzsche et al., CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials, BMJ, vol.340, issue.mar23 1, p.869, 2010.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.c869
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2844943