Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Conceptions of sport ability and practice of sport: an implicit measure

Abstract : People may endorse two conceptions of the nature of sport ability: an entity theory (sport ability is considered innate, stable, a gift, a talent) and an incremental theory (sport ability is improvable, linked to training and effort). Previous studies (e. g., Biddle et al., 2003) have used explicit methods to assess these beliefs. Using an implicit measure (ST-IAT, Single-Target Implicit Association Test) in order to overcome the social desirability which might be induced by self-reported measures, this study examined (1) whether automatic and implicit conceptions of sportsper-sons and non-sportspersons differed, and (2) the correlation between IAT score and explicit perceived competence in sport. The results showed that sportspersons automatically associated sport with training rather than talent, whereas non-sportsper-sons had an easier association between sport and talent. Even if sportspersons had higher perceived competence in sport than non-sportspersons, the IAT score was not related to perceived competence.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [32 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01649471
Contributor : Nicolas Mascret <>
Submitted on : Monday, November 27, 2017 - 3:18:13 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, February 7, 2019 - 4:38:32 PM

File

Mascret Falconetti & Cury (201...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Citation

Nicolas Mascret, Jean-Louis Falconetti, François Cury. Conceptions of sport ability and practice of sport: an implicit measure. International Journal of Sport Psychology, Pozzi, 2016, 47 (2), pp.122-132. ⟨10.7352/IJSP2016.47.122⟩. ⟨hal-01649471⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

171

Files downloads

149