The inverse Banzhaf problem, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.12, issue.3, pp.371-377, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-009-0402-8
PARETO EFFICIENCY AND WEIGHTED MAJORITY RULES, International Economic Review, vol.25, issue.4, pp.1067-1088, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-005-0017-7
Fair Representation, 1982. ,
\Weighted Voting does not Work: a Mathematical Analysis, Rutgers Law Review, vol.19, pp.317-343, 1965. ,
On the Weights of Nations: Assigning Voting Weights in a Heterogeneous Union, ) \On the Weights of Nations : Assigning Voting Weights in a Heterogeneous Union, pp.317-339, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1086/501172
Bargaining in Legislatures, The American Political Science Review, vol.83, issue.4, pp.1181-1206, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1961664
Welfarist evaluations of decision rules for boards of representatives, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.38, issue.2, pp.581-608, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-007-0246-z
\A Power Measure Analysis of Amendedment 36 in Colorado, Public Choice, vol.124, pp.231-246, 2008. ,
\Minimizing the Threat of a Positive Majority Deecit in Two-Tier Voting Systems with Equipopulous Units, Public Choice, vol.145, pp.75-94, 2013. ,
A Utilitarian Assessment of Alternative Decision Rules in the Council of Ministers, European Union Politics, vol.146, issue.4, pp.395-419, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0014-2921(94)90042-6
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00571717
Welfarist evaluations of decision rules under interstate utility dependencies, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.146, issue.2, pp.315-344, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-009-0399-z
The probability of casting a decisive vote: The effects of a caucus, Public Choice, vol.46, issue.1, pp.73-92, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00125918
Probability and Measure, Third Edition, 1995. ,
Democracy and Proportionality, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol.18, issue.2, pp.137-155, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00316.x
L S Penrose's limit theorem: Tests by simulation, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.51, issue.1, pp.90-106, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2005.06.001
URL : http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/535/1/VCMMR.pdf
(1972) \Decision Rules and Collective Values in Constitutional Choice" in Probability Models of Collective Decision Making ,
\Finding Optimal Solutions for Voting Game Design Problems, Journal of Artiicial Intelligence Research, vol.50, pp.105-140, 2014. ,
Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index, Mathematics of Operations Research, vol.4, issue.2, pp.99-131, 1979. ,
DOI : 10.1287/moor.4.2.99
The probability of conflicts in a U.S. presidential type election, Economic Theory, vol.23, issue.2, pp.227-257, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00199-003-0375-2
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00010165
On the voting power of an alliance and the subsequent power of its members, Social Choice and Welfare, pp.181-207, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-006-0171-6
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00010168
\Majority EEcient Representation of the Citizens in a Federal Union The Measurement of Voting Power, Mimeographed, 1998. ,
Minimizing the mean majority deficit: The second square-root rule, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.37, issue.1, pp.25-37, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0165-4896(98)00011-0
URL : http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/400/1/mmmss.pdf
The Treaty of Nice and qualified majority voting, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.18, issue.3, pp.431-464, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s003550100137
\Analysis of QM Rules in the Draft Constitution for Europe Proposed by the European Convention \One Stake, One Vote, 2003. ,
Condorcet's paradox, Theory and Decision, vol.77, issue.2, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1953365
Voting Paradox and Group Coherence: The Condorcet EEciency of Voting Rules, 2010. ,
\Simple Solutions, Annals of Mathematics Studies, Contributions to the Theory of Games IV, pp.247-265, 1959. ,
The electoral college vs. a direct vote: Policy bias, reversals, and indeterminate outcomes???, The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, vol.4, issue.1, pp.3-35 ,
DOI : 10.2307/1958782
\On the Enumeration of Majority Games Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation) \Proposal Rights and Political Power, Kalandrakis, T. American Journal of Political Science, vol.13, issue.50, pp.21-28, 1959. ,
What determines EU decision making? Needs, power or both?, Economic Policy, vol.19, issue.39, pp.221-266, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0327.2004.00123.x
Optimal Apportionment, Journal of Political Economy, vol.121, issue.3, pp.584-608 ,
DOI : 10.1086/670380
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00667852
Directed and weighted majority games, ZOR Zeitschrift f???r Operations Research Methods and Models of Operations Research, vol.5, issue.2, pp.189-216 ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF01415753
\Square Root Voting in the Council of the European Union: Rounding EEects and the Jagiellonian Compromise, 2012a) \On the Inverse Power Index Problem, pp.61-989, 2008. ,
On minimum sum representations for weighted voting games, Annals of Operations Research, vol.14, issue.3, pp.361-369, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1109/PGEC.1965.264136
Heuristic and exact solutions to the inverse power index problem for small voting bodies, Annals of Operations Research, vol.24, issue.3/4, pp.137-163, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1951053
\Dimension of the Lisbon Voting Rules in the EU Council: A Challenge and New World Record, Optimization Letters, 2015. ,
Mostly Sunny: A Forecast of Tomorrow's Power Index Research, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.32, pp.133-146, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2435041
On the Democratic Weights of Nations, Journal of Political Economy, vol.125, issue.5, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1086/693039
The nucleolus of large majority games, Economics Letters, vol.123, issue.2, pp.139-143 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.01.041
Which Voting Rule Minimizes the Probability of the Referendum Paradox? Lessons from French Data, Electoral Systems, Paradoxes, Assumptions and Procedures, pp.129-150, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_5
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00658580
Success Versus Decisiveness, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol.28, issue.4, pp.185-205, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0014-2921(94)90042-6
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00150527
Assessing success and decisiveness in voting situations, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.24, issue.1, pp.171-197, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-003-0298-7
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00109417
Bargaining in committees as an extension of Nash's bargaining theory, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.132, issue.1, pp.291-305, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2005.05.004
Bargaining in Committees of Representatives, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol.28, issue.1, pp.93-106, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-662-00411-1_18
Noncooperative foundations of bargaining power in committees and the Shapley???Shubik index, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.63, issue.1, pp.341-353, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2007.09.003
Voting and Collective Decision-Making: Bargaining and Power, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511493553
Egalitarianism and utilitarianism in committees of representatives, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.14, issue.4, pp.221-243, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-009-0438-9
\Is the Allocation of Power among EU States Fair?, Public Choice, vol.94, issue.3/4, pp.317-340, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1004965310450
Why not proportional?, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.63, issue.2, pp.90-93, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.10.012
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00625308
Correlation, partitioning and the probability of casting a decisive vote under the majority rule, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.64, pp.11-22, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.03.001
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01452554
Voting power in the EU council of ministers and fair decision making in distributive politics, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.63, issue.2, pp.159-173, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.11.004
Van Der Straeten (2015a) \The Social Cost of Districting, Toulouse School of Economics ,
Van Der Straeten (2015b) \Innuence Versus Utility in the Evaluation of Voting Rules: A New Look at the Penrose Formula, Public Choice, vol.165, 2016. ,
\Power Indices as an Aid to Institutional Design: The Generalised Apportionment Problem, Jahrbuch fur Neue Politische Okonomie, p.22, 2003. ,
Three ways to compute accurately the probability of the referendum paradox, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.62, issue.1, pp.28-33 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.04.006
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00602133
\Referendum Paradox in a Federal Union with Unequal Populations: the three state case, Economics Bulletin, vol.34, pp.2201-2207, 2014. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01102577
L.S. Penrose's limit theorem: proof of some special cases, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.47, issue.1, pp.37-49, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0165-4896(03)00069-6
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00423379
Cases where the Penrose limit theorem does not hold, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.53, issue.3, pp.232-238, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2007.01.005
Voting Fairly: Transitive Maximal Intersecting Families of Sets, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, vol.91, issue.1-2, pp.386-410, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jcta.2000.3103
Equal representation in two-tier voting systems, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.46, issue.3, pp.401-420, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.3998/mpub.7687
URL : http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/1918/1/WRAP_maaser_wp18505.pdf
A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.63, issue.2, pp.174-180, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.10.008
The Mean Voter, the Median Voter, and Welfare-Maximizing Voting Weights, Voting Power and Procedures, pp.159-176, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-05158-1_10
\Computing the Optimal Weights in a Utilitarian Model of Apportionment, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.63, pp.41-51, 2012. ,
Self-Enforcing Voting in International Organizations, American Economic Review, vol.96, issue.4, pp.1137-1158, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1257/aer.96.4.1137
Probabilities of Certain Election Results, The American Mathematical Monthly, vol.55, issue.4, pp.203-209, 1949. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2305583
On the Nucleolus as a Power Index, Homo Oeconomicus, vol.22, pp.551-567, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-35929-3_15
Noncooperative foundations of the nucleolus in majority games, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.54, issue.2, pp.380-397, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2005.01.001
The Inter-Institutional Distribution of Power in EU Codecision, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.38, issue.35, pp.129-154, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511609350
Voting Paradoxes, and how to deal with them ?, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-662-03782-9
The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol.109, issue.1, pp.53-57, 1946. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2981392
On the objective study of crowd behavior, Proportional Representation, 1952. ,
Decision-Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice, American Political Science Review, vol.62, issue.01, pp.40-56, 1969. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1907651
Coalition formation on major policy dimensions: The Council of the European Union 1998 to 2004, Public Choice, vol.38, issue.1, pp.447-467, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0014-2921(94)90042-6
\Is Majority Rule Special ?" in Probability Models of Collective Decision Making, 1972. ,
Simple games: An outline of the descriptive theory, Behavioral Science, vol.7, issue.1, pp.59-66, 1962. ,
DOI : 10.4153/CJM-1961-009-8
\A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System, American Political Science Review, vol.48, p.787792, 1954. ,
The (sub-)optimality of the majority rule, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.74, issue.2, pp.651-665, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2011.08.002
Brams (1981) \Power and Satisfaction in an Ideologically Divided Voting Body, Power, Voting and Voting Power, 1977. ,
Simple Games, 1999. ,
The apportionment problem and the European Parliament, European Economic Review, vol.9, issue.3, pp.247-263, 1977. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0014-2921(77)80028-7
\Comparison of Public Choice Systems, 1978. ,
\From a Toy Model to the Double Squareroot Voting System, \Penrose Voting System and Optimal Quota \Square Root Voting System, Optimal Threshold and " in Voting Power and Procedures, pp.39-49, 1995. ,