N. Alon and P. H. Edelman, The inverse Banzhaf problem, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.12, issue.3, pp.371-377, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-009-0402-8

Y. Azrieli and S. Kim, PARETO EFFICIENCY AND WEIGHTED MAJORITY RULES, International Economic Review, vol.25, issue.4, pp.1067-1088, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-005-0017-7

M. Balinski and P. Young, Fair Representation, 1982.

J. F. Banzhaf, \Weighted Voting does not Work: a Mathematical Analysis, Rutgers Law Review, vol.19, pp.317-343, 1965.

S. Barberr-a, M. O. Jackson, S. , and M. O. Jackson, On the Weights of Nations: Assigning Voting Weights in a Heterogeneous Union, ) \On the Weights of Nations : Assigning Voting Weights in a Heterogeneous Union, pp.317-339, 2004.
DOI : 10.1086/501172

D. Baron and J. Et-ferejohn, Bargaining in Legislatures, The American Political Science Review, vol.83, issue.4, pp.1181-1206, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/1961664

C. Beisbart and L. Bovens, Welfarist evaluations of decision rules for boards of representatives, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.38, issue.2, pp.581-608, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-007-0246-z

C. Beisbart and L. Bovens, \A Power Measure Analysis of Amendedment 36 in Colorado, Public Choice, vol.124, pp.231-246, 2008.

C. Beisbart and L. Bovens, \Minimizing the Threat of a Positive Majority Deecit in Two-Tier Voting Systems with Equipopulous Units, Public Choice, vol.145, pp.75-94, 2013.

C. Beisbart, L. Bovens, and S. Hartmann, A Utilitarian Assessment of Alternative Decision Rules in the Council of Ministers, European Union Politics, vol.146, issue.4, pp.395-419, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/0014-2921(94)90042-6

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00571717

C. Beisbart and S. Hartmann, Welfarist evaluations of decision rules under interstate utility dependencies, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.146, issue.2, pp.315-344, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-009-0399-z

S. Berg, The probability of casting a decisive vote: The effects of a caucus, Public Choice, vol.46, issue.1, pp.73-92, 1990.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00125918

P. F. Billingsley, J. Bonnet, and D. Lepelley, Probability and Measure, Third Edition, 1995.

H. Brighhouse, M. Fleurbaey-\democracy, and P. , Democracy and Proportionality, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol.18, issue.2, pp.137-155, 2010.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00316.x

P. L. Chang, V. C. Chua, and M. Machover, L S Penrose's limit theorem: Tests by simulation, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.51, issue.1, pp.90-106, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2005.06.001

URL : http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/535/1/VCMMR.pdf

R. B. Curtis, (1972) \Decision Rules and Collective Values in Constitutional Choice" in Probability Models of Collective Decision Making

B. De-keijzer, T. Klos, and Y. Zhang, \Finding Optimal Solutions for Voting Game Design Problems, Journal of Artiicial Intelligence Research, vol.50, pp.105-140, 2014.

P. Dubey and L. S. Shapley, Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index, Mathematics of Operations Research, vol.4, issue.2, pp.99-131, 1979.
DOI : 10.1287/moor.4.2.99

M. R. Feix, D. Lepelley, V. Merlin, and J. L. Rouet, The probability of conflicts in a U.S. presidential type election, Economic Theory, vol.23, issue.2, pp.227-257, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/s00199-003-0375-2

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00010165

M. R. Feix, D. Lepelley, V. Merlin, and J. L. Rouet, On the voting power of an alliance and the subsequent power of its members, Social Choice and Welfare, pp.181-207, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-006-0171-6

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00010168

M. R. Feix, D. Lepelley, V. Merlin, J. L. Rouet, and L. Vidu, \Majority EEcient Representation of the Citizens in a Federal Union The Measurement of Voting Power, Mimeographed, 1998.

D. S. Felsenthal and M. Machover, Minimizing the mean majority deficit: The second square-root rule, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.37, issue.1, pp.25-37, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0165-4896(98)00011-0

URL : http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/400/1/mmmss.pdf

D. S. Felsenthal, M. Machover, and M. , The Treaty of Nice and qualified majority voting, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.18, issue.3, pp.431-464, 2001.
DOI : 10.1007/s003550100137

D. S. Felsenthal and M. Machover, \Analysis of QM Rules in the Draft Constitution for Europe Proposed by the European Convention \One Stake, One Vote, 2003.

W. Gerhlein, Condorcet's paradox, Theory and Decision, vol.77, issue.2, 2006.
DOI : 10.2307/1953365

W. Gerhlein and D. Lepelley, Voting Paradox and Group Coherence: The Condorcet EEciency of Voting Rules, 2010.

H. M. Gurk and J. R. Isbell, \Simple Solutions, Annals of Mathematics Studies, Contributions to the Theory of Games IV, pp.247-265, 1959.

M. J. Hinich, R. Mickelsen, and P. C. , The electoral college vs. a direct vote: Policy bias, reversals, and indeterminate outcomes???, The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, vol.4, issue.1, pp.3-35
DOI : 10.2307/1958782

J. R. Isbell, \On the Enumeration of Majority Games Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation) \Proposal Rights and Political Power, Kalandrakis, T. American Journal of Political Science, vol.13, issue.50, pp.21-28, 1959.

H. Kauppi and M. Widgren, What determines EU decision making? Needs, power or both?, Economic Policy, vol.19, issue.39, pp.221-266, 2004.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0327.2004.00123.x

Y. Koriyama, J. F. Laslier, and A. , Optimal Apportionment, Journal of Political Economy, vol.121, issue.3, pp.584-608
DOI : 10.1086/670380

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00667852

I. Krohn and P. , Directed and weighted majority games, ZOR Zeitschrift f???r Operations Research Methods and Models of Operations Research, vol.5, issue.2, pp.189-216
DOI : 10.1007/BF01415753

M. S. Kurth, \Square Root Voting in the Council of the European Union: Rounding EEects and the Jagiellonian Compromise, 2012a) \On the Inverse Power Index Problem, pp.61-989, 2008.

S. Kurz, On minimum sum representations for weighted voting games, Annals of Operations Research, vol.14, issue.3, pp.361-369, 2012.
DOI : 10.1109/PGEC.1965.264136

S. Kurz and J. , Heuristic and exact solutions to the inverse power index problem for small voting bodies, Annals of Operations Research, vol.24, issue.3/4, pp.137-163, 2014.
DOI : 10.2307/1951053

S. Kurz and S. Napel, \Dimension of the Lisbon Voting Rules in the EU Council: A Challenge and New World Record, Optimization Letters, 2015.

S. Kurz, N. Maaser, S. Napel, and M. Weber, Mostly Sunny: A Forecast of Tomorrow's Power Index Research, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.32, pp.133-146, 2015.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2435041

S. Kurz, N. Maaser, and S. Napel, On the Democratic Weights of Nations, Journal of Political Economy, vol.125, issue.5, 2016.
DOI : 10.1086/693039

S. Kurz and A. , The nucleolus of large majority games, Economics Letters, vol.123, issue.2, pp.139-143
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.01.041

R. Lahrach and V. Merlin, Which Voting Rule Minimizes the Probability of the Referendum Paradox? Lessons from French Data, Electoral Systems, Paradoxes, Assumptions and Procedures, pp.129-150, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_5

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00658580

A. Laruelle, R. Mart-nez, and F. Valenciano, Success Versus Decisiveness, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol.28, issue.4, pp.185-205, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/0014-2921(94)90042-6

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00150527

A. Laruelle and F. Valenciano, Assessing success and decisiveness in voting situations, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.24, issue.1, pp.171-197, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-003-0298-7

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00109417

A. Laruelle and F. Valenciano, Bargaining in committees as an extension of Nash's bargaining theory, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.132, issue.1, pp.291-305, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2005.05.004

A. Laruelle and F. Valenciano, Bargaining in Committees of Representatives, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol.28, issue.1, pp.93-106, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-662-00411-1_18

A. Laruelle and F. Valenciano, Noncooperative foundations of bargaining power in committees and the Shapley???Shubik index, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.63, issue.1, pp.341-353, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2007.09.003

A. Laruelle and F. Valenciano, Voting and Collective Decision-Making: Bargaining and Power, 2008.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511493553

A. Laruelle and F. Valenciano, Egalitarianism and utilitarianism in committees of representatives, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.14, issue.4, pp.221-243, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-009-0438-9

A. Laruelle and M. Widgren, \Is the Allocation of Power among EU States Fair?, Public Choice, vol.94, issue.3/4, pp.317-340, 1998.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1004965310450

J. F. Laslier, Why not proportional?, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.63, issue.2, pp.90-93, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.10.012

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00625308

L. Breton, M. Lepelley, D. , and H. Smaoui, Correlation, partitioning and the probability of casting a decisive vote under the majority rule, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.64, pp.11-22, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.03.001

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01452554

L. Breton, M. , M. Montero, and V. Zapozozhets, Voting power in the EU council of ministers and fair decision making in distributive politics, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.63, issue.2, pp.159-173, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.11.004

L. Breton, M. , and K. , Van Der Straeten (2015a) \The Social Cost of Districting, Toulouse School of Economics

L. Breton, M. , and K. , Van Der Straeten (2015b) \Innuence Versus Utility in the Evaluation of Voting Rules: A New Look at the Penrose Formula, Public Choice, vol.165, 2016.

D. Leech, \Power Indices as an Aid to Institutional Design: The Generalised Apportionment Problem, Jahrbuch fur Neue Politische Okonomie, p.22, 2003.

D. Lepelley, V. Merlin, and J. L. , Three ways to compute accurately the probability of the referendum paradox, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.62, issue.1, pp.28-33
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.04.006

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00602133

D. Lepelley, V. Merlin, J. L. Rouet, and L. Vidu, \Referendum Paradox in a Federal Union with Unequal Populations: the three state case, Economics Bulletin, vol.34, pp.2201-2207, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01102577

I. Lindner and M. Machover, L.S. Penrose's limit theorem: proof of some special cases, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.47, issue.1, pp.37-49, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0165-4896(03)00069-6

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00423379

I. Lindner and M. Machover, Cases where the Penrose limit theorem does not hold, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.53, issue.3, pp.232-238, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2007.01.005

D. E. Loeb and A. R. Conway, Voting Fairly: Transitive Maximal Intersecting Families of Sets, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, vol.91, issue.1-2, pp.386-410, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/jcta.2000.3103

N. Maaser and S. Napel, Equal representation in two-tier voting systems, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.46, issue.3, pp.401-420, 2007.
DOI : 10.3998/mpub.7687

URL : http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/1918/1/WRAP_maaser_wp18505.pdf

N. Maaser and S. Napel, A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.63, issue.2, pp.174-180, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.10.008

N. Maaser and S. Napel, The Mean Voter, the Median Voter, and Welfare-Maximizing Voting Weights, Voting Power and Procedures, pp.159-176, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-05158-1_10

A. Mac-e and R. Treibich, \Computing the Optimal Weights in a Utilitarian Model of Apportionment, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.63, pp.41-51, 2012.

G. Maggi and M. Morelli, Self-Enforcing Voting in International Organizations, American Economic Review, vol.96, issue.4, pp.1137-1158, 2006.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.96.4.1137

K. May, Probabilities of Certain Election Results, The American Mathematical Monthly, vol.55, issue.4, pp.203-209, 1949.
DOI : 10.2307/2305583

M. Montero, On the Nucleolus as a Power Index, Homo Oeconomicus, vol.22, pp.551-567, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-35929-3_15

M. Montero, Noncooperative foundations of the nucleolus in majority games, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.54, issue.2, pp.380-397, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2005.01.001

S. Napel and M. Widgren, The Inter-Institutional Distribution of Power in EU Codecision, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.38, issue.35, pp.129-154, 2006.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511609350

H. Nurmi, Voting Paradoxes, and how to deal with them ?, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-662-03782-9

L. S. Penrose, The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol.109, issue.1, pp.53-57, 1946.
DOI : 10.2307/2981392

L. S. Penrose, H. K. Lewis, . Co, . London, and F. Pukelsheim, On the objective study of crowd behavior, Proportional Representation, 1952.

D. W. Rae, Decision-Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice, American Political Science Review, vol.62, issue.01, pp.40-56, 1969.
DOI : 10.2307/1907651

. Van-roozendaal, Coalition formation on major policy dimensions: The Council of the European Union 1998 to 2004, Public Choice, vol.38, issue.1, pp.447-467, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/0014-2921(94)90042-6

N. Schooeld, \Is Majority Rule Special ?" in Probability Models of Collective Decision Making, 1972.

L. S. Shapley, Simple games: An outline of the descriptive theory, Behavioral Science, vol.7, issue.1, pp.59-66, 1962.
DOI : 10.4153/CJM-1961-009-8

L. S. Shapley and M. Shubik, \A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System, American Political Science Review, vol.48, p.787792, 1954.

P. W. Schmitz and T. Tr@bullet-oger, The (sub-)optimality of the majority rule, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.74, issue.2, pp.651-665, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2011.08.002

P. D. Stran, P. D. Stran, M. D. Davis, and S. J. , Brams (1981) \Power and Satisfaction in an Ideologically Divided Voting Body, Power, Voting and Voting Power, 1977.

A. D. Taylor and W. S. Zwicker, Simple Games, 1999.

H. Theil and L. Schrage, The apportionment problem and the European Parliament, European Economic Review, vol.9, issue.3, pp.247-263, 1977.
DOI : 10.1016/S0014-2921(77)80028-7

R. J. Weber, \Comparison of Public Choice Systems, 1978.

R. J. Weber, \From a Toy Model to the Double Squareroot Voting System, \Penrose Voting System and Optimal Quota \Square Root Voting System, Optimal Threshold and " in Voting Power and Procedures, pp.39-49, 1995.