Communication des organisations : comparaison des approches scientifiques en gestion et en communication.

Abstract: Although communication has long been considered as an important organizational element, it only recently became a scientific object. This article aims to compare the ways (epistemology, methodology, process, object, etc.) in which organizational communication is understood by researchers in management science and communication science. By performing a contents analysis of thirty scientific papers, we discovered three relatively homogeneous groups of items. The disciplinary diversity of one group provides a starting point to discuss certain research practices

Bénédicte Aldebert (1) , Laurent Morillon (2)

1 GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion
2 LERASS - Laboratoire d'Etudes et de Recherches Appliquées en Sciences Sociales

Domains: Humanities and Social Sciences; Business administration

Bénédicte Aldebert, Laurent Morillon. Abstract: Although communication has long been considered as an important organizational element, it only recently became a scientific object. This article aims to compare the ways (epistemology, methodology, process, object, etc.) in which organizational communication is understood by researchers in management science and communication science. By performing a contents analysis of thirty scientific papers, we discovered three relatively homogeneous groups of items. The disciplinary diversity of one group provides a starting point to discuss certain research practices. Revue des Interactions Humaines Médiatisées (RIHM) = Journal of Human Mediated Interactions, 2012. ⟨hal-01841574⟩