Appraising financial protection in health: the case of Tunisia, Int. J. Health Care Finance Econ, vol.13, issue.1, pp.73-93, 2013. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01498257
Fairness in healthcare finance and delivery: what about Tunisia?, Health Pol. Plann, vol.29, issue.4, pp.433-442, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1093/heapol/czt029
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01463931
Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure, J. Risk Uncertain, vol.39, pp.137-160, 2009. ,
Repeated dichotomous formats for eliciting Willingness to Pay: simultaneous estimation and anchoring effects, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.36, issue.4, pp.75-497, 2007. ,
Asymptotic inference from multi-stage samples, J. Econom, vol.126, pp.145-171, 2005. ,
Anchor and adjustment in single-bounded dichotomous-choice questions, Am. J. Agric. Econ, vol.79, issue.5, pp.1495-1500, 1997. ,
The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent-valuation studies, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.25, pp.80-99, 1993. ,
OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.17, pp.230-246, 1989. ,
Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.28, issue.2, pp.155-173, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1995.1011
Incentive and information properties of preference questions commentary and extensions, 2011. ,
D ecision en pr esence d'incertitude et d' emotions face a des risques de catastrophes naturelles, 2013. ,
Can a circular payment card format effectively elicit preferences? Evidence from a survey on mandatory health insurance scheme in Tunisia, Appl. Health Econ. Health Pol, vol.15, issue.3, pp.385-398, 2017. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01590009
A general model of starting point bias in double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation surveys, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.50, pp.362-377, 2005. ,
Giving stated preference respondents "time to think": results from four countries, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.51, issue.4, pp.473-496, 2012. ,
Valuing risk reductions: testing for range biases in payment card and random card sorting methods, J. Environ. Plann. Manag, vol.50, issue.4, pp.467-482, 2007. ,
Order bias in estimates of willingness to pay for drugs to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Eur. J. Health Econ, vol.6, pp.146-151, 2005. ,
B en efices economiques de la protection contre le risque d'inondation. Document de travail D4E. S erie Etudes 06-E05, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.43, pp.360-385, 2002. ,
Starting-point bias and respondent uncertainty in dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys, Resour. Energy Econ, vol.29, pp.570-581, 2007. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00175925
The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: Methodological Issues and Research Needs, 1996. ,
Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.30, pp.112-131, 1996. ,
Bias in discrete response contingent valuation, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.28, pp.114-125, 1995. ,
Sequence effects in the valuation of multiple environmental programs using the contingent valuation method, Land Econ, vol.91, issue.1, pp.20-35, 2015. ,
Eliciting several willingness to pay in a single contingent valuation survey: application to health care, Health Econ, vol.12, pp.51-64, 2003. ,
Interval bidding in a distribution elicitation format, Appl. Econ, vol.49, issue.51, pp.5200-5211, 2017. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01576239
Have health insurance reforms in Tunisia attained their intended objectives?, Int J Health Econ Manag, vol.15, issue.1, pp.29-51, 2015. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01456119
Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method, 1989. ,
Stated preferences, real behaviour and anchoring: some empirical evidence, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.13, pp.235-248, 1999. ,
Valuation of multiple environmental programs, J. Risk Uncertain, vol.21, issue.1, pp.95-115, 2000. ,
Ordering effects in nested 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' contingent valuation designs, Ecol. Econ, vol.45, pp.255-270, 2003. ,
The impact of information on non-health attributes on willingness to pay for multiple health care programmes, Soc. Sci. Med, vol.58, issue.7, pp.1257-1269, 2004. ,
Structure compatibility and restructuring in judgment and choice, Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform, vol.65, issue.2, pp.106-116, 1996. ,
Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science, vol.185, pp.1124-1131, 1974. ,
With a little help from an anchor. Discussion and evidence of anchoring effects in contingent valuation, J. Socio-Econ, vol.35, pp.836-853, 2006. ,
Sequencing and the adding-up property in contingent valuation of endangered species: are contingent non-use values economic values?, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.29, pp.419-433, 2004. ,
Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: a Stochastic Perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1997. ,
The generalization of "Student's" problem when several different population variances are involved, Biometrika, vol.34, issue.1-2, pp.28-35, 1947. ,
Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.36, pp.170-185, 1998. ,
Incentive incompatibility and starting-point bias in iterative valuation questions, Land Econ, vol.78, pp.285-297, 2002. ,
A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen, vol.125, pp.387-402, 1996. ,
Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, second ed, 2002. ,
Consumer willingness to pay for fair trade coffee: a Chinese case study, J. Agric. Appl. Econ, vol.44, issue.1, pp.21-34, 2012. ,