M. Abu-zaineh, H. B. Romdhane, B. Ventelou, J. Moatti, and A. Chokri, Appraising financial protection in health: the case of Tunisia, Int. J. Health Care Finance Econ, vol.13, issue.1, pp.73-93, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01498257

M. Abu-zaineh, C. Arfa, B. Ventelou, H. B. Romdhane, and J. Moatti, Fairness in healthcare finance and delivery: what about Tunisia?, Health Pol. Plann, vol.29, issue.4, pp.433-442, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/heapol/czt029

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01463931

L. R. Anderson and J. M. Mellor, Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure, J. Risk Uncertain, vol.39, pp.137-160, 2009.

J. E. Ara~-na and C. J. Le-on, Repeated dichotomous formats for eliciting Willingness to Pay: simultaneous estimation and anchoring effects, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.36, issue.4, pp.75-497, 2007.

D. Bhattacharya, Asymptotic inference from multi-stage samples, J. Econom, vol.126, pp.145-171, 2005.

K. Boyle, F. R. Johnson, and D. Mccollum, Anchor and adjustment in single-bounded dichotomous-choice questions, Am. J. Agric. Econ, vol.79, issue.5, pp.1495-1500, 1997.

K. Boyle, M. Welsh, and R. Bishop, The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent-valuation studies, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.25, pp.80-99, 1993.

T. A. Cameron and D. D. Huppert, OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.17, pp.230-246, 1989.

R. T. Carson and R. C. Mitchell, Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.28, issue.2, pp.155-173, 1995.
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1995.1011

R. T. Carson and T. Groves, Incentive and information properties of preference questions commentary and extensions, 2011.

O. Chanel, G. Chichilnisky, S. Massoni, J. Vergnaud, and S. Vincent-lyk-jensen, D ecision en pr esence d'incertitude et d' emotions face a des risques de catastrophes naturelles, 2013.

O. Chanel, K. Makhloufi, and M. Abu-zaineh, Can a circular payment card format effectively elicit preferences? Evidence from a survey on mandatory health insurance scheme in Tunisia, Appl. Health Econ. Health Pol, vol.15, issue.3, pp.385-398, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01590009

Y. L. Chien, C. Huang, and D. Shaw, A general model of starting point bias in double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation surveys, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.50, pp.362-377, 2005.

J. Cook, M. Jeuland, B. Maskery, and D. Whittington, Giving stated preference respondents "time to think": results from four countries, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.51, issue.4, pp.473-496, 2012.

J. Covey, G. Loomes, and I. Bateman, Valuing risk reductions: testing for range biases in payment card and random card sorting methods, J. Environ. Plann. Manag, vol.50, issue.4, pp.467-482, 2007.

A. De-ridder and D. De-graeve, Order bias in estimates of willingness to pay for drugs to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Eur. J. Health Econ, vol.6, pp.146-151, 2005.

P. Deronzier, S. Terra, P. Mede, and J. Deshazo, B en efices economiques de la protection contre le risque d'inondation. Document de travail D4E. S erie Etudes 06-E05, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.43, pp.360-385, 2002.

E. Flachaire and G. Hollard, Starting-point bias and respondent uncertainty in dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys, Resour. Energy Econ, vol.29, pp.570-581, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00175925

W. M. Hanemann, The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: Methodological Issues and Research Needs, 1996.

J. Herriges and J. Shogren, Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.30, pp.112-131, 1996.

B. Kanninen, Bias in discrete response contingent valuation, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.28, pp.114-125, 1995.

A. Longo, D. Hoyos, and A. Markandya, Sequence effects in the valuation of multiple environmental programs using the contingent valuation method, Land Econ, vol.91, issue.1, pp.20-35, 2015.

S. Luchini, C. Proti-ere, and J. Moatti, Eliciting several willingness to pay in a single contingent valuation survey: application to health care, Health Econ, vol.12, pp.51-64, 2003.

P. Mahieu, F. C. Wolff, J. Shogren, and P. Gastineau, Interval bidding in a distribution elicitation format, Appl. Econ, vol.49, issue.51, pp.5200-5211, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01576239

K. Makhloufi, B. Ventelou, and M. Abu-zaineh, Have health insurance reforms in Tunisia attained their intended objectives?, Int J Health Econ Manag, vol.15, issue.1, pp.29-51, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01456119

R. C. Mitchell and R. T. Carson, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method, 1989.

R. M. O'conor, M. Johannesson, and P. Johansson, Stated preferences, real behaviour and anchoring: some empirical evidence, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.13, pp.235-248, 1999.

J. W. Payne, D. A. Schkade, W. H. Desvousges, and C. Aultman, Valuation of multiple environmental programs, J. Risk Uncertain, vol.21, issue.1, pp.95-115, 2000.

N. A. Powe and I. J. Bateman, Ordering effects in nested 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' contingent valuation designs, Ecol. Econ, vol.45, pp.255-270, 2003.

C. Proti-ere, C. Donaldson, S. Luchini, J. Moatti, and P. Shackley, The impact of information on non-health attributes on willingness to pay for multiple health care programmes, Soc. Sci. Med, vol.58, issue.7, pp.1257-1269, 2004.

M. Selart, Structure compatibility and restructuring in judgment and choice, Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform, vol.65, issue.2, pp.106-116, 1996.

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science, vol.185, pp.1124-1131, 1974.

N. J. Van-exel, W. B. Brouwer, . Van-den, B. Berg, and M. A. Koopmanschap, With a little help from an anchor. Discussion and evidence of anchoring effects in contingent valuation, J. Socio-Econ, vol.35, pp.836-853, 2006.

K. Veisten, H. Hoen, and J. Starand, Sequencing and the adding-up property in contingent valuation of endangered species: are contingent non-use values economic values?, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.29, pp.419-433, 2004.

H. Wang, Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: a Stochastic Perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1997.

B. L. Welch, The generalization of "Student's" problem when several different population variances are involved, Biometrika, vol.34, issue.1-2, pp.28-35, 1947.

M. P. Welsh and G. L. Poe, Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.36, pp.170-185, 1998.

J. C. Whitehead, Incentive incompatibility and starting-point bias in iterative valuation questions, Land Econ, vol.78, pp.285-297, 2002.

T. Wilson, C. Houston, K. Etling, and N. Brekke, A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen, vol.125, pp.387-402, 1996.

J. M. Wooldridge, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, second ed, 2002.

S. Yang, W. Hu, M. Mupandawana, and Y. Liu, Consumer willingness to pay for fair trade coffee: a Chinese case study, J. Agric. Appl. Econ, vol.44, issue.1, pp.21-34, 2012.