, Move scenario: Hence, if you take 100 people living in LESSPOL, ? Regulation scenario: Hence, if the regulation is implemented, among 100 people, ? Drug scenario: Hence

, This person will have lost around 10 years of life. Move scenario: If these 100 people live in POL, ? Regulation scenario: If the regulation are not implemented

, The effects on the living environment cause effects that are not related to health. They make buildings dirty, so that they need to be cleaned more frequently, they smell bad and create a cloud of brown dust and particulates

I. Ajzen, The directive influence of attitudes on behavior, Psychology of Action, pp.385-403, 1996.

A. Alberini, M. Cropper, A. Krupnick, and N. Simon, Does the value of a statistical life vary with age and health status? Evidence from the US and Canada, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, issue.48, pp.769-792, 2004.

B. Alvarez-farizo, N. Hanley, R. Barberán, A. Lázaro, and A. , Choice modeling at the "market stall": individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation, Ecol. Econ, vol.60, pp.743-751, 2007.

D. Ami, F. Aprahamian, O. Chanel, and S. Luchini, A test of cheap talk in different hypothetical contexts: the case of air pollution, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.50, issue.1, pp.111-130, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00382511

D. Ami, F. Aprahamian, O. Chanel, R. Joulé, and S. Luchini, Willingness to pay of committed citizens: a field experiment, Ecol. Econ, vol.105, pp.31-39, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00289451

J. Andreoni, Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public good experiments, J. Publ. Econ, vol.37, issue.3, pp.291-304, 1988.

F. Aprahamian, O. Chanel, and S. Luchini, Modeling starting point bias and unobserved heterogeneity in contingent valuation surveys: an application to air pollution, Am. J. Agric. Econ, vol.89, issue.2, pp.533-547, 2007.

C. Aqueveque, Extrinsic cues and perceived risk: the influence of consumption situation, J. Consum. Market, vol.23, issue.5, pp.237-247, 2006.

C. Aqueveque, The effect of extrinsic cues on imported wine evaluations: an experimental approach, J. Food Prod. Market, vol.14, issue.3, pp.33-47, 2008.

S. E. Asch, Opinions and social pressure, Sci. Am, vol.193, issue.5, pp.31-35, 1955.

J. C. Bergstrom, J. R. Stroll, and A. Randall, The impact of information on environmental commodity valuation decisions, Am. J. Agric. Econ, vol.72, issue.3, pp.614-621, 1990.

F. Carlsson, Design of stated preference surveys: is there more to learn from behavioral economics?, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.46, issue.2, pp.167-177, 2010.

O. Chanel, S. Cleary, and S. Luchini, Does public opinion influence willingness-to-pay? Evidence from the field, Appl. Econ. Lett, vol.13, issue.13, pp.821-824, 2006.

O. Chanel, S. Cleary, and S. Luchini, Individual responsiveness to information in CV surveys: commitment matters, Rev. Écon. Polit, vol.117, issue.5, pp.761-779, 2007.

O. Chanel, S. Luchini, S. Massoni, and J. Vergnaud, Impact of information on intentions to vaccinate in a potential epidemic: swine-origin Influenza A (H1N1), Soc. Sci. Med, vol.72, pp.142-148, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00543821

R. Chetty, Behavioral economics and public policy: a pragmatic perspective, Am. Econ. Rev, vol.105, issue.5, pp.1-33, 2015.

R. B. Cialdini and N. J. Goldstein, Social influence: compliance and conformity, Annu. Rev. Psychol, vol.55, pp.591-621, 2004.

R. G. Cummings and O. Taylor, Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method, Am. Econ. Rev, vol.89, issue.3, pp.649-666, 1999.

M. Czajkowski, N. Hanley, and J. Lariviere, The effects of experience on preferences: theory and empirics for environmental public goods, Am. J. Agric. Econ, vol.97, issue.1, pp.333-351, 2015.

M. Czajkowski, N. Hanley, and J. Lariviere, Controlling for the effects of information in a public goods discrete choice model, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.63, issue.3, pp.523-544, 2016.

B. Desaigues, A. Rabl, D. Ami, B. M. Kene, S. Masson et al., Monetary value of a life expectancy gain due to reduced air pollution: lessons from a contingent valuation, The Memorial Issue of REP for Brigitte Desaigues, vol.5, pp.675-698, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00472890

B. Fischhoff, Cognitive processes in stated preference methods, Handbook of Environmental Economics, vol.2, 2005.

M. Fleurbaey and E. Schokkaert, Behavioral welfare economics and redistribution, Am. Econ. J. Microecon, vol.5, issue.3, pp.180-205, 2013.

J. K. Galbraith, A Contemporary Guide to Economics, Peace and Laughter, 1971.

J. Guria, J. Leung, M. Jones-lee, and G. Loomes, The willingness to accept value of statistical life relative to the willingness to pay value: evidence and policy implications, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.32, pp.113-127, 2005.

J. Herriges and J. Shogren, Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.30, issue.1, pp.112-131, 1996.

N. Jacquemet, A. James, S. Luchini, and J. Shogren, Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.48, pp.411-433, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00584247

R. V. Joulé and J. L. Beauvois, The Psychology of Commitment. Experiments Linking Behavior to Belief, 1971.

A. Krupnick, A. Alberini, M. Cropper, N. Simon, B. O'brien et al., Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a contingent valuation study of Ontario residents, J. Risk Uncertain, vol.24, pp.161-186, 2002.

J. List, P. Sinha, and M. Taylor, Using choice experiments to value non-market goods and services, Adv. Econ. Anal. Pol, vol.6, issue.2, pp.1-37, 2006.

J. Little and R. Berrens, Explaining disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values: further investigation using meta-analysis, Econ. Bull, vol.3, issue.6, pp.1-13, 2004.

J. Lohse, T. Goeschl, and J. H. Diederich, Giving is a question of time: response times and contributions to an environmental public good, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.67, pp.455-477, 2017.

A. Maruyama and M. Kikuchi, Risk-Learning process in forming willingness-to-pay for egg safety, Agribusiness, vol.20, issue.2, pp.167-179, 2004.

R. C. Mitchell and R. T. Carson, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, 1989.

A. Munro and N. Hanley, Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method, pp.258-279, 2001.

J. J. Murphy, P. G. Allen, and T. H. Stevens, A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation, Environ. Resour. Econ, vol.30, issue.3, pp.313-325, 2005.

P. Polomé, Experimental evidence on deliberate misrepresentation in referendum contingent valuation, J. Econ. Behav. Organisat, vol.52, pp.387-401, 2003.

D. Prelec, A Bayesian truth serum for subjective data, Science, vol.306, issue.5695, pp.462-466, 2004.

D. Prelec, H. S. Seung, and J. Mccoy, A solution to the single-question crowd wisdom problem, Nature, vol.541, pp.532-535, 2017.

L. A. Robinson and J. K. Hammitt, Behavioral economics and regulatory analysis, Risk Anal, vol.31, issue.9, pp.1408-1422, 2011.

R. Rowe, R. C. D'arge, and D. S. Brookshire, An experiment on the economic value of visibility, J. Environ. Econ. Manag, vol.7, issue.1, pp.1-19, 1980.

H. A. Salazar and L. Oerlemans, Do we follow the leader or the masses? Antecedents of the willingness to pay extra for eco-products, J. Consum. Aff, vol.50, issue.2, pp.286-314, 2016.

M. Sherif, . Harper, . Oxford, . England, J. F. Shogren et al., Do we need a new behavioral benchmark for BCA?, J. Benefit-Cost Anal, vol.7, issue.1, pp.92-106, 1936.

C. L. Spash, Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: coral reef biodiversity, J. Econ. Psychol, vol.23, pp.665-687, 2002.

S. Stefani, R. Scarpa, R. Lombardi, and G. V. , An addendum to: a meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation, Bio base Appl. Econ, vol.3, pp.175-184, 2014.

W. Viscusi, W. A. Magat, and A. Forrest, Altruistic and private valuations of risk reduction, J. Pol. Anal. Manag, vol.7, issue.2, pp.227-245, 1988.

C. A. Vossler, M. Doyon, and D. Rondeau, Truth in consequentiality: theory ash and field evidence on discrete choice experiments, Am. Econ. J. Microecon, vol.4, issue.4, pp.145-171, 2012.

J. C. Whitehead, Incentive incompatibility and starting-point bias in iterative valuation questions, Land Econ, vol.78, pp.285-297, 2002.

A. Yatchew and Z. Griliches, Specification error in probit models, Rev. Econ. Stat, vol.67, pp.134-139, 1985.