D. J. Brennan, M. S. Robson, M. Murphy, O. Herlihy, and C. , Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.201, issue.3, pp.1-8, 2009.

E. L. Barber, L. S. Lundsberg, K. Belanger, C. M. Pettker, E. F. Funai et al., Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate, Obstet Gynecol, vol.118, issue.1, pp.29-38, 2011.

J. Zhang, J. Troendle, U. M. Reddy, S. K. Laughon, D. W. Branch et al., Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.203, issue.4, pp.326-327, 2010.

B. Blondel, N. Lelong, M. Kermarrec, and F. Goffinet, National Coordination Group of the National Perinatal Surveys. Trends in perinatal health in France from 1995 to 2010. Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.41, issue.4, pp.1-5, 2012.

R. M. Silver, M. B. Landon, D. J. Rouse, K. J. Leveno, C. Y. Spong et al., Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries, Obstet Gynecol, vol.107, issue.6, pp.1226-1258, 2006.

, Indications de la cé sarienne programmé e a ` terme, HAS, 2012.

, Accouchement

A. B. Caughey, A. G. Cahill, J. Guise, and D. J. Rouse, Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), vol.210, pp.179-93, 2014.

N. Chaillet, A. Dumont, M. Abrahamowicz, J. C. Pasquier, F. Audibert et al., A cluster-randomized trial to reduce cesarean delivery rates in Quebec, N Engl J Med, vol.372, issue.18, pp.1710-1731, 2015.

A. Lasnet, A. Jelen, X. Douysset, J. Pons, and F. Sergent, Introducing a daily obstetric audit: a solution to reduce the cesarean section rate?, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.44, issue.6, pp.550-557, 2015.

D. J. Rouse, J. Owen, and J. C. Hauth, Active-phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 hours, Obstet Gynecol, vol.93, issue.3, pp.323-331, 1999.

D. J. Rouse, S. J. Weiner, S. L. Bloom, M. W. Varner, C. Y. Spong et al., Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.201, issue.4, pp.357-358, 2009.

O. Dupuis, R. Silveira, A. Zentner, A. Dittmar, P. Gaucherand et al., Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.192, issue.3, pp.868-74, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00179668

L. Ray, C. Serres, P. Schmitz, T. Cabrol, D. Goffinet et al., Manual rotation in occiput posterior or transverse positions: risk factors and consequences on the cesarean delivery rate, Obstet Gynecol, vol.110, issue.4, pp.873-882, 2007.

R. W. Mcquivey, O. Reichman, E. Gdansky, B. Latinsky, S. Labi et al., Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section, Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol, vol.136, pp.25-28, 2008.

, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.171, issue.2, pp.3-4, 2013.

B. L. Shaffer, Y. W. Cheng, J. E. Vargas, and A. B. Caughey, Manual rotation to reduce caesarean delivery in persistent occiput posterior or transverse position, J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med, vol.24, issue.1, pp.65-72, 2011.

O. Dupuis, S. Ruimark, C. D. Simone, T. André, D. René--charles et al., Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.123, issue.2, pp.193-200, 2005.

R. K. Laros, T. A. Flanagan, and S. J. Kilpatrick, Management of term breech presentation: a protocol of external cephalic version and selective trial of labor, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.172, issue.6, pp.1923-1928, 1995.

L. Bret, T. Grangé, G. Goffinet, F. Cabrol, and D. , External cephalic version: experience about 237 versions at Port-Royal maternity

, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.33, issue.4, pp.297-303, 2004.

A. Lojacono, G. Donarini, A. Valcamonico, M. Soregaroli, and T. Frusca,

, Minerva Ginecol, vol.55, issue.6, pp.519-543, 2003.

F. Vendittelli, O. Riviè-re, J. C. Pons, and N. Mamelle, Obsté triciens du Ré seau Sentinelle AUDIPOG. [Breech presentation at term: evolution of French practices and an analysis of neonatal results in regards to obstetrical management of breech presentation

, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.31, issue.3, pp.261-72, 2002.

M. Carayol, S. Alexander, F. Goffinet, G. Bré-art, A. S. Uzan et al., Mode of delivery and term breech presentation in the PREMODA cohort, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.33, issue.1, pp.37-44, 2004.

, CNGOF 2000. Cé sarienne: consé quences et indications

J. Chatfield, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Am Fam Physician, vol.64, issue.1, pp.169-70, 2001.