Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Book sections

Les procès fictifs, une réaction pertinente à l’inapplication du droit ?

Abstract : Curious phenomenon and unknown to lawyers, the fictitious trial is a tool that is more and more used by civil society. It occurs in reaction to the impotence or inaction of review procedures. Monsanto Tribunal, World Tribunal on Iraq, are the various denominations which may allow one to postulate that the fictitious trial is a ponctual element (created by and for a given fact, or several facts at a given period), while being timeless as well, as it may be illustrated by the Russel Tribunal (Vietnam, Congo, Palestine) or the Permanent People’s Tribunal (Tibet, Armenian genocide, Tchernobyl…). The fictitious trial enables one to explore the causes and the consequences of the non-enforcement of law. The non-enforcement of law, and in particular the right to engage in legal proceedings, does not leave one indifferent, but leads the path towards new ways for a restorative and reconstructive justice. The non-enforcement of law may shift the center of creation of law towards non traditional spaces, not less legitimate than any other spaces as they constitute true spaces for public deliberation.
Document type :
Book sections
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [35 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02106913
Contributor : Laura Canali <>
Submitted on : Monday, April 29, 2019 - 9:17:01 AM
Last modification on : Tuesday, October 20, 2020 - 3:31:56 AM

File

procès fictif et inapplicati...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-02106913, version 1

Collections

Citation

Laura Canali, Chetna Malviya. Les procès fictifs, une réaction pertinente à l’inapplication du droit ?. R. Le Boeuf et O. Le Bot, L’inapplication du droit, éd. DICE, coll. Confluence des droits, Aix-en-Provence, à paraître 2019, A paraître, L'inapplication du droit. ⟨hal-02106913⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

143

Files downloads

230