I. Clausen, Conservaive versus radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. A review, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol.75, pp.8-12, 1996.

M. Yao and T. Tulandi, Current status of surgical and nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy, Feril Steril, vol.67, pp.421-454, 1997.

E. Katz, M. A. Akman, M. D. Damewood, and J. E. García, Deleterious effect of the presence of hydrosalpinx on implantation and pregnancy rates with in vitro fertilization, Feril Steril, vol.66, pp.122-127, 1996.

A. Kontoravdis, Proximal tubal occlusion and salpingectomy result in similar improvement in in vitro fertilization outcome in patients with hydrosalpinx, Feril Steril, vol.86, pp.1642-1651, 2006.

H. B. Zeyneloglu, Hydrosalpinx and assisted reproduction: options and rationale for treatment, Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, vol.13, pp.281-287, 2001.

N. P. Johnson, W. Mak, and M. C. Sowter, Laparoscopic salpingectomy for women with hydrosalpinges enhances the success of IVF: a cochrane review, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.17, pp.543-551, 2002.

Y. Beyth and U. Meiri, Ferility following excision of the mesotubarium superius in the rabbit, Isr J Med Sci, vol.18, pp.519-540, 1982.

M. Fan and L. Ma, Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to hypersimulaion during in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis, Feril Steril, vol.106, pp.322-331, 2016.

A. Kotlyar, J. Gingold, S. Shue, and T. Falcone, The Effect of Salpingectomy on Ovarian Function, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, vol.24, pp.563-78, 2017.

J. Tal, Ovarian response to gonadotropin simulation in repeated IVF cycles after unilateral salpingectomy, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.19, pp.451-456, 2002.

W. Xi, F. Gong, Y. Tang, H. Zhang, and G. Lu, Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy, Int J Gynaecol Obstet Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet, vol.116, pp.93-99, 2012.

T. A. Gelbaya, Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy or the division of fallopian tubes for hydrosalpinges, Feril Steril, vol.85, pp.1464-1472, 2006.

R. Orvieto, Does salpingectomy affect the ipsilateral ovarian response to gonadotropin during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles?, Feril Steril, vol.95, pp.1842-1846, 2011.

S. Yoon, Does salpingectomy have a deleterious impact on ovarian response in in vitro fertilization cycles?, Feril Steril, vol.106, pp.1083-92, 2016.

M. Noventa, Salpingectomy before assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic literature review, J Ovarian Res, vol.9, p.74, 2016.

M. F. Mutlu, Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than aniMüllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles, J Assist Reprod Genet, vol.30, pp.657-65, 2013.

P. Dar, G. S. Sachs, D. Strassburger, I. Bukovsky, and S. Arieli, Ovarian function before and after salpingectomy in artificial reproductive technology patients, Hum Reprod Oxf Engl, vol.15, pp.142-146, 2000.

A. Lass, Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to superovulaion in an in vitro ferilization-embryo transfer program, Feril Steril, vol.70, pp.1035-1043, 1998.

I. Streuli, AMH concentration is not related to effective time to pregnancy in women who conceive naturally, Reprod Biomed Online, vol.28, pp.216-240, 2014.

G. S. Kalra, S. Campbell, and G. Nargund, Ovarian reserve may be compromised after adnexal surgery: Are we sufficiently fertility-focused in our surgical training? Facts Views Vis ObGyn, vol.8, pp.104-112, 2016.