First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.3, p.12600, 2017. ,
Chromosome-selective sequencing of maternal plasma cell-free DNA for first-trimester detection of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.206, issue.4, 2012. ,
DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study, Genet Med, vol.14, issue.3, pp.296-305, 2012. ,
Noninvasive prenatal detection and selective analysis of cell-free DNA obtained from maternal blood: evaluation for trisomy 21 and trisomy 18, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.206, issue.4, p.319, 2012. ,
Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study, BMJ, vol.342, p.7401, 2011. ,
Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21 by sequencing of DNA in maternal blood: a study in a clinical setting, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.204, issue.3, p.205, 2011. ,
Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21 based on analysis of cellfree fetal DNA circulating in the maternal plasma, Prenat Diagn, vol.35, issue.5, pp.471-476, 2015. ,
ACMG statement on noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, Genet Med, vol.15, issue.5, pp.395-398, 2013. ,
Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, vol.47, issue.2, pp.263-292, 1979. ,
Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l'Ecole americaine, Econometrica, vol.21, issue.4, pp.503-546, 1953. ,
Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms, Q J Econ, vol.75, issue.4, pp.643-669, 1961. ,
Individual differences in aversion to ambiguity regarding medical tests and treatments: association with cancer screening cognitions, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, vol.23, issue.12, pp.2916-2923, 2014. ,
Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance, Q J Econ, vol.110, issue.3, pp.585-603, 1995. ,
Effect of cell-free DNA screening vs direct invasive diagnosis on miscarriage rates in women with pregnancies at high risk of trisomy 21: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA, vol.320, issue.6, pp.557-565, 2018. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02624442
An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set, Psychometrika, vol.50, pp.159-179, 1985. ,
Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function, J Am Stat Assoc, vol.58, pp.236-244, 1963. ,
Cluster Analysis for Applications, 1973. ,
Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals, Eur J Hum Genet, vol.24, issue.7, pp.968-975, 2016. ,
Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: a cross-sectional survey of service users' views and likely uptake, BJOG, vol.121, issue.5, pp.582-594, 2014. ,
Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening, Eur J Hum Genet, vol.22, issue.12, pp.1345-1350, 2014. ,
Patient's choice between a non-invasive prenatal test and invasive prenatal diagnosis based on test accuracy, Fetal Diagn Ther, vol.35, issue.3, pp.193-198, 2014. ,
Non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome: pregnant women's views and likely uptake, Public Health Genomics, vol.16, issue.5, pp.223-232, 2013. ,
Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: what women want and are willing to pay, Patient Educ Couns, vol.93, issue.3, pp.641-645, 2013. ,
Women's and health professionals' preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: a discrete choice experiment to contrast noninvasive prenatal diagnosis with current invasive tests, Genet Med, vol.14, issue.11, pp.905-913, 2012. ,
Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: pregnant women's interest and expected uptake, Prenat Diagn, vol.31, issue.13, pp.1292-1299, 2011. ,
,
Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing: part II-women's perspectives, Prenat Diagn, vol.36, issue.12, pp.1091-1098, 2016. ,
Women's preference for non-invasive prenatal DNA testing versus chromosomal microarray after screening for Down syndrome: a prospective study, BJOG, vol.125, issue.4, pp.451-459, 2018. ,
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, vol.1982, pp.153-160 ,
Factors that affect the decision to undergo amniocentesis in women with normal Down syndrome screening results: it is all about the age, Health Expect, vol.18, issue.6, pp.2306-2317, 2015. ,