Response to Dr. Veld et al. Regarding the Manuscript Titled “What is the Best Option Between Primary Diverting Stoma or Endoscopic Stent as a Bridge to Surgery with a Curative Intent for Obstructed Left Colon Cancer? Results from a Propensity Score Analysis of the French Surgical Association Multicenter Cohort of 518 patients”

Diane Mege (1, 2, 3) , Charles Sabbagh (4) , Gilles Manceau (5) , Mehdi Karoui (6)

1 VRCM - Vascular research center of Marseille
2 C2VN - Centre recherche en CardioVasculaire et Nutrition = Center for CardioVascular and Nutrition research
3 Service d'oncologie digestive et hépato-gastro-entérologie [Hôpital de la Timone - APHM]
4 Department Digestion and Oncology Surgery
5 MEPPOT - U1147 - Médecine Personnalisée, Pharmacogénomique, Optimisation Thérapeutique
6 Service d'hépato-gastro-entérologie [APHP Henri Mondor]

Domaines: Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]

Diane Mege, Charles Sabbagh, Gilles Manceau, Mehdi Karoui. Response to Dr. Veld et al. Regarding the Manuscript Titled “What is the Best Option Between Primary Diverting Stoma or Endoscopic Stent as a Bridge to Surgery with a Curative Intent for Obstructed Left Colon Cancer? Results from a Propensity Score Analysis of the French Surgical Association Multicenter Cohort of 518 patients”. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 26 (6), pp.1954-1955. ⟨10.1245/s10434-019-07281-3⟩. ⟨hal-02570759⟩