HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

LA DOCTRINE FACE AU CONTRÔLE DE PROPORTIONNALITÉ IN CONCRETO COMME ILLUSTRATION D'UNE CONTROVERSE SUR LES MÉTHODES DU DROIT

Abstract : Since 2013, the French academic doctrine has dealt with a new phenomenon : the introduction of proportionality in the decisions of the Cour de cassation. Authors have adopted different opinions regarding the introduction of proportionality depending whether they considerer it compatible or not with the traditional function of the Cour de cassation. This article aims at questioning the dichotomies that structure the French academic discourse and putting into perspective a confusion between casuistry and case-by-case decision-making. More generally, the approach that I follow highlights the obstacles of rule based decision making in the presence of fundamental rights.
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03590889
Contributor : Emanuela Nani Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, February 28, 2022 - 11:18:47 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, March 2, 2022 - 3:25:25 AM

File

CMJ 2018-5-255-274_LA_DOCTRINE...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-03590889, version 1

Collections

Citation

Victoria Fourment. LA DOCTRINE FACE AU CONTRÔLE DE PROPORTIONNALITÉ IN CONCRETO COMME ILLUSTRATION D'UNE CONTROVERSE SUR LES MÉTHODES DU DROIT. Revue de la Recherche Juridique - Droit prospectif, Cahiers de Méthodologie Juridique, PUAM, 2019, Le raisonnement par cas. Le raisonnement par cas en droit, 2018-5 (32), pp.2051-2070. ⟨hal-03590889⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

17

Files downloads

2