Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Contemporary variations of immune responsiveness during range expansion of two invasive rodents in Senegal

Christophe Diagne 1, 2 Emmanuelle Gilot-Fromont 3, 4 Stéphane Cornet 2 Laëtitia Husse 2 Souleymane Doucouré 5 Ambroise Dalecky 2, 6 Khalilou Bâ 2 Mamadou Kane 2 Youssoupha Niang 2 Mamoudou Diallo 2 Aliou Sow 2 Odile Fossati-Gaschignard 2 Sylvain Piry 2 Emmanuelle Artige 2 Mbacké Sembène 1, 2 Carine Brouat 2 Nathalie Charbonnel 2
1 UCAD - Université Cheikh Anta Diop [Dakar, Sénégal]
2 UMR CBGP - Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations
3 Biodémographie évolutive
Département écologie évolutive [LBBE]
4 LBBE - Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive - UMR 5558
5 URMITE - Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes
6 LPED - Laboratoire Population-Environnement-Développement
Abstract : Biological invasions provide unique opportunities for studying life history trait changes over contemporary time scales. As spatial spread may be related to changes in parasite communities, several hypotheses (such as the evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA) or EICA-refi ned hypotheses) suggest immune changes in invasive species along invasion gradients. Although native hosts may be subject to similar changes in parasite selection pressures, their immune responses have been rarely investigated in invasion contexts. In this study, we evaluated immune variations for invasive house mice Mus musculus domesticus , invasive black rats Rattus rattus and native rodents Mastomys erythroleucus and Mastomys natalensis along well-characterised invasion gradients in Senegal. We focused on antibody-mediated (natural antibodies and complement) and infl ammatory (haptoglobin) responses. One invasion route was considered for each invasive species, and environmental conditions were recorded. Natural-antibody mediated responses increased between sites of long-established invasion and recently invaded sites only in house mice. Both invasive species exhibited higher infl ammatory responses at the invasion front than in sites of long-established invasion. Th e immune responses of native species did not change with the presence of invasive species. Th ese patterns of immune variations do not support the EICA and EICA refi ned hypotheses, and they rather suggest a higher risk of exposure to parasites on the invasion front. Altogether, these results provide a fi rst basis to further assess the role of immune changes in invasion success.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [53 references]  Display  Hide  Download
https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01463805
Contributor : Ambroise Dalecky <>
Submitted on : Friday, February 10, 2017 - 11:05:28 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, October 14, 2020 - 3:47:04 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Thursday, May 11, 2017 - 12:31:00 PM

Files

Vignette du document
oik-03470accepted_withoutproof...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

UNIV-AMU | CNRS | INRA | INRIA | BIOENVIS | AGROPOLIS | CIRAD | IRD | UNIV-MONTPELLIER | UNIV-LYON1 | LPED | OSU-INSTITUT-PYTHEAS | VETAGRO-LBBE | MONTPELLIER-SUPAGRO | UDL | INRAE

Citation

Christophe Diagne, Emmanuelle Gilot-Fromont, Stéphane Cornet, Laëtitia Husse, Souleymane Doucouré, et al.. Contemporary variations of immune responsiveness during range expansion of two invasive rodents in Senegal. Oikos, Nordic Ecological Society, 2016, 126 (3), pp.435 - 446. ⟨10.1111/oik.03470⟩. ⟨hal-01463805⟩

Export

BibTeX TEI DC DCterms EndNote

Share

Metrics

Record views

991

Files downloads

723